Wednesday, July 17, 2019

“Maid in Manhattan” Film Analysis Essay

Think its safe to say that ever soyone pass to knock against J.Los latest release, wetnurse in Manhattan, pretty much knows what to pack Single, working-class mom from the Bronx gets mixed up in Cinderella circumstances with charming (even prince-like) politician. togged up up in someone elses wardrobe, at first he tears her for a princess, but loves her anyway when the time comes to carry through and through her from her drudgery. As fluffy and formulaic as it is, sometimes this is all we ladies wanta romantic humble fairy-tale to share with our girlfriends or the husband who owes us for sitting through the latest Steven Segal debacle. Unfortunately, as much as I wanted to enjoy this photograph under said criteria, the story account was just too 1950s for me to pull away seriously. Dont get me wrong, I firmly believe that a dandy Cinderella story, ala Working Girl and Pretty womanhood (both of which this film is being compared to), git evermore be updated for a new a udience. scarce the operative word here is update, something screenwriter Kevin Wade doesnt bother with at all. Jennifer Lopez plays Marisa Ventura, a maid in a ritzy New York hotel who dreams of management, but fears her hea and thenish background will keep her from ever realizing her ambitions. Ralph Fiennes is the republican Senatorial candidate who moldiness overcome the prejudices of his campaign manager (Stanley Tucci) to inveigle his blue-collar dream girl. Honestly, this reliance on ethnicity as both a professional and personal obstacle for Marisa comes off non only as lazy, but excessively inappropriate for todays governmental and romantic world. It seems to me that if a woman as smart as Marisa were passed over solely because of her race or housekeeping status, she would certainly know who to contact in the HR department to file a complaint. Similarly, if Fienness campaign manager really cant see what a political boon it would be for a Republican to fall for a strug gling, single mom, then he assumes to be shoot and immediately sent back to some(prenominal) publicity playpen he toddled stunned of.Anyone with even the least bit of political savvy would surely know how to bend such a situation into a PR goldmine. These may not be issues that would trouble everyone, but for me, this silly, outdated bandage translated to an hour and a half of nearly straight boredom (pretty clothes and arouse Winston jewels not withstanding). Also, while both Lopez and Fiennes resign in adequate performances, very some sparks build between them,so, of course, the obligatory commove scene is thrown in to convert us they really are dropping in love. It goes without saying this is not the multi far-offiousness of lie our teenagers once again need reinforced to them.So moms, if you do take a Christmas shopping break with your daughters to see this one, I would make sure to layer out how drastically this worldly adaptation of love differs from our Christia n one. For a far more entertaining afternoon out, you readiness consider Sweet Home aluminum. It too has some moral problems with its visage of homosexuality, but the main characters relationship relies on a much deeper foundation, and Reese Witherspoon experiences some increment pains that could provide good lessons for progeny women. Overall, Maid in Manhattan is simply your average, cast of the mill romantic comedy, with very little to make it more than a tenant on a slow Saturday night.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.